Comparative Analysis of Geometric Elements of Bicycle Infrastructure According to British and Serbian Standards
Abstract
This paper presents a detailed comparative analysis of two key documents regulating the design of bicycle infrastructure: Local Transport Note 1/20 – Cycle Infrastructure Design from the United Kingdom and the Manual for the Design of Bicycle Infrastructure of the Republic of Serbia. The research focuses on a comparative examination of geometric elements, including widths, radii, gradients, sight distances, and cyclist guidance through intersections. Particular emphasis is placed on differences in design approaches, safety standards, inclusivity, and their implications for contemporary urban planning. The results indicate significant differences in approach: British standards are more modern, inclusive, and aligned with international best practices, while the Serbian manual provides basic technical guidelines but requires further improvement in order to adequately address the contemporary needs of all users of bicycle infrastructure.
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Road and Traffic Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY-NC that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
